Global Forum Shows Division on Journalism's Role

I have spent the last two days listening to debates and conversations at the Deutsche Welle Global Media Forum on this year’s theme: “Conflict Prevention in the Multimedia Age.” The conference has brought together constituencies who don’t often talk to one another — working journalists and NGOs and educators dedicated to developing media in post-conflict regions and emerging democracies.

I’ve been ducking in and out of sessions trying to get a feel for audiences and questions while I prepare for a panel the Dart Center has organized for later today. I’ve been struck by how consistently a few questions keep emerging again and again:

  • What is the distinction between journalism and media development as part of civil society building? What are the boundaries between independent journalism and the specific goal of using media to promote peace and understanding?
  • Related: in policies and training programs, how much should citizen reporting be emphasized versus professional journalism?
  • How can humanitarian workers and journalists collaborate?  When should they not?
  • Is good journalism descriptive storytelling, or is good journalism a call to action?
  • How can journalists and humanitarian workers best use new technologies for various goals? In particular: social networking, mobile phones and Twitter?

The answers to these questions often come in the form of friendly disagreements. But these disagreements can reflect basic differences concerning the role of journalism in the world, and some of the arguments have been robust and passionate.

Check out Wednesday's post for ways to follow the Global Media Forum online.