Hannah Arendt's Disruptive Truth Telling
Beth Hamishpath – the House of Justice: These words shouted by the court usher at the top of his voice make us jump to our feet as they announce the arrival of the three judges, who, bareheaded, in black robes, walk into the courtroom from a side room to take their seats on the highest tier of the raised platform.”
So begins Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem, a book originally published in 1963 as a series of articles in The New Yorker magazine, centered on Adolph Eichman’s war crimes trial for his role in the Holocaust. At a standing room-only event in the World Room at Columbia Journalism School last week, Dart Center Executive Director Bruce Shapiro read those lines, calling the book “a still controversial and potent thesis about the banality of evil and complicity, and how large scale evil happens.”
On the 50th anniversary of the book’s publication, the Dart Center hosted a lively forum with Pulitzer Prize-winning author and human rights journalist, Tina Rosenberg, and moral philosopher and Einstein Forum director, Susan Neiman. The discussion ranged from journalistic lessons derived from Arendt’s work to debate about the moral and philosophical questions posed by the book, which Arendt subtitled with the chilling phrase, “the banality of evil.”